The U.S. Constitution
Was the
Constitutional Convention legal?
|
B |
enjamin Rush declared
that the Revolution was not complete until America's institutions were
transformed in accordance with the premises of liberty. The Revolution was not
completed until the framers had drafted the Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation required that
Congress propose any amendments and that these changes be adopted unanimously.
In
Sept 1786, 12 delegates from five states met in Annapolis, Md., and issued a
call for a second convention to be held in Philadelphia in May 1787, to
consider changes that "may be necessary to their common interest and their
permanent harmony."
Madison and his allies
persuaded Congress, after months of inaction, to endorse the Constitutional
Convention, though the members imposed severe restrictions on the convention's
mandate. On Feb. 21, 1787, the
Confederation Congress passed a resolution calling for a convention to discuss
"revisions" and "alterations" of the Union.
Madison also convinced Edmund Randolph, the
governor of Virginia, to correspond with other governors and legislatures to
persuade them to attend the convention. At the head of the list of delegates
from Virginia, Madison and Randolph placed the name of George Washington,
without consulting the general.
On the
question of the legality of the Convention, Washington would say this:
"The legality of this Convention I do not mean to discuss.... That powers
are wanting, none can deny.... That which takes the shortest course to obtain
them, will, in my opinion, under present circumstances, be found best.
Otherwise, like a house on fire, whilst the most regular mode of extinguishing
it is contended for, the building is reduced to ashes."